You must log in to edit PetroWiki. Help with editing
Content of PetroWiki is intended for personal use only and to supplement, not replace, engineering judgment. SPE disclaims any and all liability for your use of such content. More information
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
The choice of the IPR used depends on the fluid properties and reservoir drive mechanism. Standing's IPR is most appropriate for solution-gas-drive reservoirs, whereas a linear IPR is more appropriate for waterdrive reservoirs producing at pressures above the bubblepoint and for hydrocarbons without substantial dissolved gas. A more detailed discussion of this is provided in Peters<ref name="r5">Peters, E.J. 1990. Class notes. Department of Production Engineering, University of Texas at Austin (1990)</ref>. | The choice of the IPR used depends on the fluid properties and reservoir drive mechanism. Standing's IPR is most appropriate for solution-gas-drive reservoirs, whereas a linear IPR is more appropriate for waterdrive reservoirs producing at pressures above the bubblepoint and for hydrocarbons without substantial dissolved gas. A more detailed discussion of this is provided in Peters<ref name="r5">Peters, E.J. 1990. Class notes. Department of Production Engineering, University of Texas at Austin (1990)</ref>. | ||
== Formation damage vs. pseudodamage == | == Formation damage vs. pseudodamage == | ||
edits