You must log in to edit PetroWiki. Help with editing

Content of PetroWiki is intended for personal use only and to supplement, not replace, engineering judgment. SPE disclaims any and all liability for your use of such content. More information

Difference between revisions of "Conventional applications of acoustic logging"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(No difference)

Revision as of 09:54, 17 September 2013

This page discusses interpretation of acoustic logging using conventional applications.


Interpretation of acoustic-log data begins with the slowness values obtained from processing the recorded waveforms. Slowness, or porosity derived from slowness, may be corrected for additional factors before use in applications. Today, log analysis and interpretation is routinely performed by computers during data acquisition (in real time) or in post-acquisition processing in offices and computing centers. Modern interpretation software is built on algorithms derived from the empirical relationships originally used to create a variety of graphical solutions contained in crossplots and nomograms.[1] Because porosity tools vary in their sensitivity to lithology, porosity, and fluid properties, the combination of different measurements allows more-accurate determination of the following kinds of characteristics:

  • Porosity
  • Petrophysical
  • Geological

The logging service companies issue chartbooks with tool-specific charts to facilitate rapid manual determination of:

  • Porosity
  • Lithology
  • Shaly-sand analysis
  • Saturation
  • Mechanical properties
  • Cement-bond evaluation

These charts, which are accompanied by instructions for their use, form the basis for quick-look interpretations and for quality control of computer interpretations.[2][3]

The earliest applications of acoustic-logging measurements made use of compressional slowness, used alone or in combination with resistivity logs and other porosity logs. This group of applications still comprises the basic set of applications for acoustic-log data, which includes:

  • Velocity
  • Porosity
  • Gas identification
  • Lithology
  • Fluid saturation
  • Rock strength

In the 1960s, laboratory studies indicated that shear-wave data could also prove useful in formation evaluation.[4] The development and introduction of reliable shear-wave acquisition and full-waveform logging in the late 1970s and 1980s resulted in improved accuracy in these conventional applications.[5] Further advances throughout the 1980s and 1990s, in both basic and applied research as well as in tool technology, led to new and advanced applications that use shear- and Stoneley-wave amplitude and attenuation (Table 1), e.g.:

  • Permeability estimation
  • Anisotropy determination
  • Direct hydrocarbon indicators


Below are some applications of acoustic logging:


  1. Fertl, W.H. 1981. Openhole Crossplot Concepts A Powerful Technique in Well Log Analysis. J Pet Technol 33 (3): 535-549. SPE-8115-PA.
  2. Bigelow, E.L. 1995. Introduction to Wireline Log Analysis, 1-312. Houston: Baker Atlas.
  3. Boyer, S. and Mari, J.-L. 1997. Seismic Surveying and Well Logging Oil and Gas Exploration Techniques, 1-192. Paris: Editions Technip.
  4. Pickett, G.R. 1963. Acoustic Character Logs and Their Applications in Formation Evaluation. J Pet Technol 15 (6): 659-667. SPE-452-PA.
  5. Medlin, W.L. and Alhllall, K.A. 1992. Shear-Wave Porosity Logging in Sands. SPE Form Eval 7 (1): 106-112. SPE-20558-PA.

Noteworthy papers in OnePetro

Use this section to list papers in OnePetro that a reader who wants to learn more should definitely read

External links

Use this section to provide links to relevant material on websites other than PetroWiki and OnePetro

See also

Acoustic logging

Acoustic logging tools

Advanced acoustic data analysis

PEH:Acoustic Logging