Formation damage: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 68: Line 68:
[[File:Vol4 page 0242 eq 003.png|RTENOTITLE]]....................(3)
[[File:Vol4 page 0242 eq 003.png|RTENOTITLE]]....................(3)


Clearly, a flow efficiency of 1 indicates an undamaged well with Δ''p''<sub>skin</sub> = 0, a flow efficiency > 1 indicates a stimulated well (perhaps because of a hydraulic fracture), and a flow efficiency < 1 indicates a damaged well. Note that, to determine flow efficiency, we must know the average reservoir pressure, [[File:PR.PNG|middle|20x20px]], and skin factor, ''S''. Methods to measure these quantities are discussed in [[Determination_of_flow_efficiency_and_skin|Determination of flow efficiency and skin]].
Clearly, a flow efficiency of 1 indicates an undamaged well with Δ''p''<sub>skin</sub> = 0, a flow efficiency > 1 indicates a stimulated well (perhaps because of a hydraulic fracture), and a flow efficiency < 1 indicates a damaged well. Note that, to determine flow efficiency, we must know the average reservoir pressure,[[File:PR.PNG|middle|25x25px|PR]], and skin factor, ''S''. Methods to measure these quantities are discussed in [[Determination_of_flow_efficiency_and_skin|Determination of flow efficiency and skin]].


The impact of skin on well productivity can be estimated by the use of [[Reservoir_inflow_performance|inflow performance relationships]] (IPRs) for the well such as those proposed by Vogel, <ref name="r3">Vogel, J.V. 1968. Inflow Performance Relationships for Solution-Gas Drive Wells. J Pet Technol 20 (1): 83-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1476-PA</ref> Fetkovich, <ref name="r4">Fetkovich, M.J. 1973. The Isochronal Testing of Oil Wells. Presented at the Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Las Vegas, Nevada, 30 September-3 October 1973. SPE-4529-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4529-MS</ref> and Standing. <ref name="r2">Standing, M.B. 1970. Inflow Performance Relationships for Damaged Wells Producing by Solution-Gas Drive. J Pet Technol 22 (11): 1399-1400. SPE-3237-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3237-PA</ref> These IPRs can be summarized as follows<ref name="r5">Peters, E.J. 1990. Class notes. Department of Production Engineering, University of Texas at Austin (1990)</ref>:
The impact of skin on well productivity can be estimated by the use of [[Reservoir_inflow_performance|inflow performance relationships]] (IPRs) for the well such as those proposed by Vogel, <ref name="r3">Vogel, J.V. 1968. Inflow Performance Relationships for Solution-Gas Drive Wells. J Pet Technol 20 (1): 83-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1476-PA</ref> Fetkovich, <ref name="r4">Fetkovich, M.J. 1973. The Isochronal Testing of Oil Wells. Presented at the Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Las Vegas, Nevada, 30 September-3 October 1973. SPE-4529-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4529-MS</ref> and Standing. <ref name="r2">Standing, M.B. 1970. Inflow Performance Relationships for Damaged Wells Producing by Solution-Gas Drive. J Pet Technol 22 (11): 1399-1400. SPE-3237-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3237-PA</ref> These IPRs can be summarized as follows<ref name="r5">Peters, E.J. 1990. Class notes. Department of Production Engineering, University of Texas at Austin (1990)</ref>:
Automoderated users, Bureaucrats, checkuser, contributors, createpage, diff, display-new-unapproved-content, displaysubtitle, edit, editsandbox, history, industry, Interface administrators, member, memberonlyaccess, minoredit, Moderators, override, reupload, reupload-own, Staff, Administrators, upload, Upload Wizard campaign editors, viewlinktolatest, watch, widgeteditor, wysiwyg
7,247

edits