You must log in to edit PetroWiki. Help with editing

Content of PetroWiki is intended for personal use only and to supplement, not replace, engineering judgment. SPE disclaims any and all liability for your use of such content. More information


Steam assisted gravity drainage: Difference between revisions

PetroWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Replaced tarsands with oilsands. Minor wording. Corrected SOR formula.)
Line 1: Line 1:
Steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is an outstanding example of a steam injection process devised for a specific type of heavy oil reservoir utilizing [[Horizontal_well_applications_in_steamflooding|horizontal wells]]. It is widely used in Alberta, Canada for recovery of heavy oil and tar sand resources.
Steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is an outstanding example of a steam injection process devised for exploitation of heavy oil reservoir utilizing [[Horizontal_well_applications_in_steamflooding|horizontal wells]]. It is widely used in Alberta Canada, Russia, and China for recovery of heavy and extra-heavy oilsands resources.


== Basic process ==
==Basic process==


Several variations of the basic process have been developed, and are being tested. The original SAGD process, as developed by Butler, McNab, and Lo<ref name="r1">Butler, R.M., McNab, G.S., and Lo, H.Y. 1981. Theoretical studies on the gravity drainage of heavy oil during in-situ steam heating. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 59 (4): 455-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450590407</ref> in 1979, utilizes two parallel horizontal wells in a vertical plane: the injector being the upper well and the producer the lower well ('''Fig. 1''', taken from Butler<ref name="r2">Butler, R.M. 1985. A new approach to the modeling of steam-assisted gravity drainage. J Can Pet Technol 24 (3): 42–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/85-03-01</ref>). If the oil/bitumen mobility is initially very low, steam is circulated in both wells for conduction heating of the oil around the wells. Steam is then injected into the upper well, while producing the lower well. As a result, steam rises forming a steam chamber with oil flowing at the sides of the chamber and condensate flowing inside the chamber, as shown in '''Fig. 1'''. This is an idealized situation. Other flow regimes may occur depending on the oil and formation properties.
Several variations of the basic process have been developed, and are being tested. The original SAGD process, as developed by Butler, McNab, and Lo<ref name="r1">Butler, R.M., McNab, G.S., and Lo, H.Y. 1981. Theoretical studies on the gravity drainage of heavy oil during in-situ steam heating. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 59 (4): 455-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450590407</ref> in 1979, utilizes two parallel horizontal wells in a vertical plane: the injector being the upper well and the producer the lower well ('''Fig. 1''', taken from Butler<ref name="r2">Butler, R.M. 1985. A new approach to the modeling of steam-assisted gravity drainage. J Can Pet Technol 24 (3): 42–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/85-03-01</ref>). If the oil/bitumen mobility is initially very low, steam is circulated in both wells for conduction heating of the oil around the wells. Steam is then injected into the upper well, while producing the lower well. As a result, steam rises forming a steam chamber with oil flowing at the sides of the chamber and condensate flowing inside the chamber, as shown in '''Fig. 1'''. This is an idealized situation. Other flow regimes may occur depending on the oil and formation properties.


<gallery widths="300px" heights="200px">
<gallery widths="300px" heights="200px">
File:vol5 Page 1355 Image 0001.png|'''Fig. 1 – Conceptual diagram of the SAGD process (after Butler<ref name="r2" />).'''
File:Vol5 Page 1355 Image 0001.png|'''Fig. 1 – Conceptual diagram of the SAGD process (after Butler<ref name="r2" />).'''
</gallery>
</gallery>


== Estimating production rates ==
==Estimating production rates==


For the simplest case, the oil production rate ''q''<sub>''oh''</sub>, in B/D per ft well length, is given by (multiplier "2" indicates flow from two sides of the steam chamber)
For the simplest case, the oil production rate ''q''<sub>''oh''</sub>, in B/D per ft well length, is given by (multiplier "2" indicates flow from two sides of the steam chamber)
Line 21: Line 21:
where ''m'' is derived from the viscosity-temperature relationship of the oil.
where ''m'' is derived from the viscosity-temperature relationship of the oil.


'''Eq. 2''' predicts rates of 0.1 to 0.7 B/D per ft for a horizontal well for an oil viscosity of 100,000 cp. For example, a 2,000-ft long well may be expected to produce about 800 B/D at a steam temperature of 400°F. The theory has been verified by laboratory experiments. Field results to-date have been encouraging. One commercial project (EnCana’s Foster Creek Project), consisting of 22 well pairs, has been in operation since October 2001. In 2002, steam/oil ratios were averaging 2.5 bbl oil/bbl of steam. Earlier field tests of SAGD in Athabasca tar sands were successful at a depth of about 600 ft, which is too deep for surface mining and not deep enough for high-pressure steam injection.
'''Eq. 2''' predicts rates of 0.1 to 0.7 B/D per ft for a horizontal well for an oil viscosity of 100,000 cp. For example, a 2,000-ft long well may be expected to produce about 800 B/D at a steam temperature of 400°F. The theory has been verified by laboratory experiments. Field results to-date have been encouraging. One commercial project (EnCana’s Foster Creek Project), consisting of 22 well pairs, has been in operation since October 2001. In 2002, steam/oil ratios were averaging 2.5 bbl steam/bbl of oil. Earlier field tests of SAGD in Athabasca oilsands were successful at a depth of about 600 ft, which is too deep for surface mining and not deep enough for high-pressure steam injection.


== Considerations ==
==Considerations==


SAGD is a complex process because gravity flow strongly relies on a high vertical permeability. The initial oil mobility determines the vertical spacing of the two wells. In a million cp tar sand, the spacing would be 5 to 6 m [16 to 20 ft]. It is also important that the steam chamber be sealed. There is no steam migration to offset vertical wells. In California, SAGD failed to achieve commercial success because of relatively high initial mobility of oil, as well as other reasons.
SAGD is a complex process because gravity flow strongly relies on a high vertical permeability. Typical vertical well spacing between injector and producer is 5 to 6 m [16 to 20 ft]. It is also important that the steam chamber be sealed with an impermeable shale caprock to ensure reservoir containment. There is no steam migration to offset vertical wells. In California, SAGD failed to achieve commercial success because of relatively high initial mobility of oil, as well as other reasons.


== Variations ==
==Variations==


One variation of SAGD is known as single-well SAGD. Here, insulated tubing is used to inject steam into a single horizontal well, with production from the annulus. This process was successful in a few cases but generally failed. Another variation (Vapex) utilizes a suitable solvent (such as ethane, propane, etc.) instead of steam and is being field tested.
One variation of SAGD is known as single-well SAGD. Here, insulated tubing is used to inject steam into a single horizontal well, with production from the annulus. This process was successful in a few cases but generally failed. Another variation (Vapex) utilizes a suitable solvent (such as ethane, propane, etc.) instead of steam and is being field tested.


== Nomenclature ==
==Nomenclature==


{|
{|
|-
|-
| ''h''<sub>''h''</sub>
|''h''<sub>''h''</sub>
| =
|=
| fluid level in stimulated reservoir, ft [m]
|fluid level in stimulated reservoir, ft [m]
|-
|-
| ''k''
|''k''
| =
|=
| reservoir permeability, md [μm<sup>3</sup>]
|reservoir permeability, md [μm<sup>3</sup>]
|-
|-
| ''k''<sub>''ro''</sub>
|''k''<sub>''ro''</sub>
| =
|=
| relative permeability to oil
|relative permeability to oil
|-
|-
| ''m''*
|''m''*
| =
|=
| exponent in '''Eqs. 1''', and '''2'''
|exponent in '''Eqs. 1''', and '''2'''
|-
|-
| ''q''<sub>''oh''</sub>
|''q''<sub>''oh''</sub>
| =
|=
| hot oil production rate, B/D [m<sup>3</sup>/d]
|hot oil production rate, B/D [m<sup>3</sup>/d]
|-
|-
| ''S''<sub>''o''</sub>
|''S''<sub>''o''</sub>
| =
|=
| oil saturation
|oil saturation
|-
|-
| ''S''<sub>''ors''</sub>
|''S''<sub>''ors''</sub>
| =
|=
| residual oil saturation to steam fraction
|residual oil saturation to steam fraction
|-
|-
| ''T''
|''T''
| =
|=
| average temperature in heated reservoir, °F
|average temperature in heated reservoir, °F
|-
|-
| ''T''<sub>''R''</sub>
|''T''<sub>''R''</sub>
| =
|=
| unaffected reservoir temperature, °F
|unaffected reservoir temperature, °F
|-
|-
| ''T''<sub>''s''</sub>
|''T''<sub>''s''</sub>
| =
|=
| steam temperature, °F
|steam temperature, °F
|-
|-
| ''Ф''
|''Ф''
| =
|=
| porosity
|porosity
|}
|}


== References ==
==References==


<references />
<references />


== Noteworthy papers in OnePetro ==
==Noteworthy papers in OnePetro==


Mukhametshina, A., Hascakir, B., Bitumen extraction by expanding solvent-steam assisted gravity drainage (ES-SAGD) with asphaltene solvents and non-solvents, 2014 SPE Heavy Oil Conference, 10-12 June, 2014, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, SPE 170013-MS., [https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-170013-MS https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-170013-MS]
Mukhametshina, A., Hascakir, B., Bitumen extraction by expanding solvent-steam assisted gravity drainage (ES-SAGD) with asphaltene solvents and non-solvents, 2014 SPE Heavy Oil Conference, 10-12 June, 2014, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, SPE 170013-MS., https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-170013-MS


== External links ==
==External links==


Use this section to provide links to relevant material on websites other than PetroWiki and OnePetro
Use this section to provide links to relevant material on websites other than PetroWiki and OnePetro


== See also ==
==See also==


[[Thermal_recovery_by_steam_injection|Thermal recovery by steam injection]]
[[Thermal_recovery_by_steam_injection|Thermal recovery by steam injection]]


[[Category:5.3.9 Steam assisted gravity drainage]]
[[Category:5.3.9 Steam assisted gravity drainage]]

Revision as of 18:18, 17 February 2021

Steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is an outstanding example of a steam injection process devised for exploitation of heavy oil reservoir utilizing horizontal wells. It is widely used in Alberta Canada, Russia, and China for recovery of heavy and extra-heavy oilsands resources.

Basic process

Several variations of the basic process have been developed, and are being tested. The original SAGD process, as developed by Butler, McNab, and Lo[1] in 1979, utilizes two parallel horizontal wells in a vertical plane: the injector being the upper well and the producer the lower well (Fig. 1, taken from Butler[2]). If the oil/bitumen mobility is initially very low, steam is circulated in both wells for conduction heating of the oil around the wells. Steam is then injected into the upper well, while producing the lower well. As a result, steam rises forming a steam chamber with oil flowing at the sides of the chamber and condensate flowing inside the chamber, as shown in Fig. 1. This is an idealized situation. Other flow regimes may occur depending on the oil and formation properties.

Estimating production rates

For the simplest case, the oil production rate qoh, in B/D per ft well length, is given by (multiplier "2" indicates flow from two sides of the steam chamber)

RTENOTITLE....................(1)

where the kinematic viscosity of oil (in centistokes) at the steam temperature, Ts, is given by νs, and that at any other temperature, T, is given by

RTENOTITLE....................(2)

where m is derived from the viscosity-temperature relationship of the oil.

Eq. 2 predicts rates of 0.1 to 0.7 B/D per ft for a horizontal well for an oil viscosity of 100,000 cp. For example, a 2,000-ft long well may be expected to produce about 800 B/D at a steam temperature of 400°F. The theory has been verified by laboratory experiments. Field results to-date have been encouraging. One commercial project (EnCana’s Foster Creek Project), consisting of 22 well pairs, has been in operation since October 2001. In 2002, steam/oil ratios were averaging 2.5 bbl steam/bbl of oil. Earlier field tests of SAGD in Athabasca oilsands were successful at a depth of about 600 ft, which is too deep for surface mining and not deep enough for high-pressure steam injection.

Considerations

SAGD is a complex process because gravity flow strongly relies on a high vertical permeability. Typical vertical well spacing between injector and producer is 5 to 6 m [16 to 20 ft]. It is also important that the steam chamber be sealed with an impermeable shale caprock to ensure reservoir containment. There is no steam migration to offset vertical wells. In California, SAGD failed to achieve commercial success because of relatively high initial mobility of oil, as well as other reasons.

Variations

One variation of SAGD is known as single-well SAGD. Here, insulated tubing is used to inject steam into a single horizontal well, with production from the annulus. This process was successful in a few cases but generally failed. Another variation (Vapex) utilizes a suitable solvent (such as ethane, propane, etc.) instead of steam and is being field tested.

Nomenclature

hh = fluid level in stimulated reservoir, ft [m]
k = reservoir permeability, md [μm3]
kro = relative permeability to oil
m* = exponent in Eqs. 1, and 2
qoh = hot oil production rate, B/D [m3/d]
So = oil saturation
Sors = residual oil saturation to steam fraction
T = average temperature in heated reservoir, °F
TR = unaffected reservoir temperature, °F
Ts = steam temperature, °F
Ф = porosity

References

  1. Butler, R.M., McNab, G.S., and Lo, H.Y. 1981. Theoretical studies on the gravity drainage of heavy oil during in-situ steam heating. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 59 (4): 455-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450590407
  2. 2.0 2.1 Butler, R.M. 1985. A new approach to the modeling of steam-assisted gravity drainage. J Can Pet Technol 24 (3): 42–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/85-03-01

Noteworthy papers in OnePetro

Mukhametshina, A., Hascakir, B., Bitumen extraction by expanding solvent-steam assisted gravity drainage (ES-SAGD) with asphaltene solvents and non-solvents, 2014 SPE Heavy Oil Conference, 10-12 June, 2014, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, SPE 170013-MS., https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-170013-MS

External links

Use this section to provide links to relevant material on websites other than PetroWiki and OnePetro

See also

Thermal recovery by steam injection