You must log in to edit PetroWiki. Help with editing

Content of PetroWiki is intended for personal use only and to supplement, not replace, engineering judgment. SPE disclaims any and all liability for your use of such content. More information


Difference between revisions of "Reserves estimation of heavy oil"

PetroWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Protected "Reserves estimation of heavy oil" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 

Latest revision as of 11:14, 11 June 2019

Discovered resources of heavy and extraheavy crude oil are estimated to be approximately 4,600 billion bbl, two-thirds of which are in Canada and Venezuela.[1] Bitumen and tar sands are excluded from this estimate. Published data on reserves estimates (RE) from this resource by primary drive mechanisms are sparse. Meyer and Mitchell[2] estimated worldwide ultimate recovery from heavy and extraheavy crude oils to be 476 billion bbl, which is 10% of the Briggs et al.[1] estimate of the discovered resource initially in place. Estimated primary reserves estimates (RE) ranges from 8 to 12% oil-in-place (OIP) for the Orinoco area of Venezuela, where stock-tank gravities range from 8 to 13°American Petroleum Institute (API).[3] Estimated primary RE ranges from 3 to 8% OIP[4] for the Lloydminster area of western Canada, where stock-tank gravities range from 13 to 17°API.

Case study

Primary RE vs. API gravity for heavy crude oil “pools” in Alberta and Saskatchewan is plotted on Fig. 1[5]. Data are from 69 “pools” with OIP > 106 m3 (6.3 million STB). The trend line is not weighted by resource size and is shown only for reference; the regression coefficient, 0.21, is too small to infer a statistically significant correlation between RE and oil gravity. Of interest, however, is that the trend line is consistent with REs shown on Table 1 for “average” sandstone for 15°API and slightly-higher-gravity oils. Also interesting (lack of correlation notwithstanding) is the large number of heavy-oil reservoirs with significantly greater REs than would be predicted using “conventional” solution gas drive calculations. Reportedly, such REs are attributed to two mechanisms:

  • Simultaneous production of oil and sand known as CHOPS[6]
  • “Foamy oil”[7]

Although there are reports of REs that range from 5 to 20% OIP,[6][8] no general correlations are available that relate specific rock/fluid properties and REs for heavy oil; thus, for volumetric methods, reserves engineers typically rely on analogy. The performance of wells in heavy oil reservoirs is erratic, however, and is influenced by varying production practices, varying volumes of sand production, and frequent downtime, among other factors, so that analogy estimates are subject to considerable uncertainty.

Reserves estimates based on performance also are subject to considerable uncertainty. Production rates for single wells usually are erratic, thereby precluding meaningful trend analysis. Many engineers generate normalized production curves from groups of wells producing from zones comparable to those being analyzed.

Summary

The producing mechanisms for heavy oil are poorly understood; an optimum production strategy has yet to be developed; a priori prediction of the efficiency of the production mechanisms for heavy oil currently is impossible. Although progress is being made on computer modeling,[9] it may be several years before sufficient data are compiled for reliable estimates of RE and/or reserves from heavy oil.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Briggs, P.J., Baron, P.R., Fulleylove, R.J. et al. 1988. Development of Heavy-Oil Reservoirs. J Pet Technol 40 (2): 206-214. SPE-15748-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/15748-PA.
  2. Meyer, R.F. and Mitchell, R.W. 1987. A Perspective on Heavy and Extra Heavy Oil, Natural Bitumen, and Shale Oil. Paper presented at the 1987 Twelfth World Petroleum Congresses, Houston.
  3. Martinez, A.R. 1987. The Orinoco Oil Belt, Venezuela. J. of Petroleum Geology 10: 125.
  4. Adams, D.M. 1982. Experiences With Waterflooding Lloydminster Heavy-Oil Reservoirs. J Pet Technol 34 (8): 1643-1650. SPE-10196-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/10196-PA.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Cronquist, C. 2001. Estimation and Classification of Reserves of Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Condensate. Richardson, Texas: SPE.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Dusseault, M. 1993. Cold Production And. Enhanced Oil Recovery. J Can Pet Technol 32 (9). PETSOC-93-09-01. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/93-09-01.
  7. Maini, B.B., Sarma, H.K., and George, A.E. 1993. Significance of Foamy-oil Behaviour In Primary Production of Heavy Oils. J Can Pet Technol 32 (9). PETSOC-93-09-07. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/93-09-07.
  8. Maini, B.B. 2001. Foamy-Oil Flow. J Pet Technol 53 (10): 54-64. SPE-68885-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/68885-MS.
  9. Kumar, R. and Pooladi-Darvish, M. 2002. Solution-Gas Drive in Heavy Oil: Field Prediction and Sensitivity Studies Using Low Gas Relative Permeability. J Can Pet Technol 41 (3). PETSOC-02-03-01. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/02-03-01.

Noteworthy papers in OnePetro

Use this section to list papers in OnePetro that a reader who wants to learn more should definitely read

External links

Use this section to provide links to relevant material on websites other than PetroWiki and OnePetro

See also

Heavy oil

Cold heavy oil production with sand

PEH:Estimation_of_Primary_Reserves_of_Crude_Oil,_Natural_Gas,_and_Condensate

Category