PEH:Immiscible Gas Injection in Oil Reservoirs: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 315: Line 315:
</gallery>
</gallery>


Because of the concentration of producing wells downdip, the gas cap draped downdip along the top of the reservoir. The Empire Abo field overall performance was excellent because of its very high vertical permeability; however, gas coning was a major issue, with the overall relatively low reservoir permeability of approximately 50 md. In 1979, Empire Abo was the site of one of the first applications of horizontal wellbores to minimize gas coning.<ref name="r59">Stramp, R.L. 1980. The Use of Horizontal Drainholes in the Empire Abo Unit. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 21-24 September 1980. SPE-9221-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/9221-MS.
Because of the concentration of producing wells downdip, the gas cap draped downdip along the top of the reservoir. The Empire Abo field overall performance was excellent because of its very high vertical permeability; however, gas coning was a major issue, with the overall relatively low reservoir permeability of approximately 50 md. In 1979, Empire Abo was the site of one of the first applications of horizontal wellbores to minimize gas coning.<ref name="r59">Stramp, R.L. 1980. The Use of Horizontal Drainholes in the Empire Abo Unit. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 21-24 September 1980. SPE-9221-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/9221-MS.fckLR</ref> The field is currently being blown down to recover as much gas as possible. On the basis of production data through 2002, on a stock-tank-oil basis, approximately 74% of the OOIP has been recovered from this field by application of the immiscible gas/oil gravity drainage process.<br/><br/>'''''Heft Kel Field (Iran)'''''<ref name="r30">Saidi, A.M. 1996. Twenty Years of Gas Injection History into Well-Fractured Haft Kel Field (Iran). Presented at the International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition of Mexico, Villahermosa, Mexico, 5–7 March. SPE 35309. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/35309-MS.</ref> An example of the application of immiscible gas/oil displacement in a large Middle East matrix-block/fracture-system reservoir is the Heft Kel field. Its Asmari reservoir structure is a strongly folded anticline that is 20 miles long by 1.5 to 3 miles wide with an oil column thickness of approximately 2,000 ft. The most probable OOIP was slightly > 7 × 10<sup>9</sup> STB with about 200 million STB in the fissures; numerical model history matching resulted in a value of 6.9 × 10<sup>9</sup> STB. The matrix block size determined from cores and flowmeter surveys varied from 8 to 14 ft. The numerical simulation model considered matrix permeabilities from 0.05 to 0.8 md. The overall horizontal and vertical permeabilities are approximately equal. There was an initial gas cap on the oil column. The oil gravity is approximately 37°API. The IFT at the bubblepoint pressure (1,412 psi and 116°F) is approximately 9 dynes/cm.<br/><br/>The field was discovered and put on production in 1928. It was produced on primary production from then until 1976 with a plateau rate of 200,000 BOPD for several early years. In 1976, gas injection began at a rate of 400 MMcf/D using gas from the nearby NIS gas dome. Recently, the field has been producing at approximately 35,000 BOPD.<br/><br/>Saidi<ref name="r30">Saidi, A.M. 1996. Twenty Years of Gas Injection History into Well-Fractured Haft Kel Field (Iran). Presented at the International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition of Mexico, Villahermosa, Mexico, 5–7 March. SPE 35309. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/35309-MS.</ref> describes the many oil recovery mechanisms at work in this oil-wet reservoir as gravity drainage at constant IFT and reservoir pressure; oil swelling in the present gas-invaded zone because of the increase in reservoir pressure; oil swelling in the present oil zone through thermal convection/diffusion process; oil imbibition within the oil column; oil gravity drainage from the partially saturated blocks within the gas-invaded zone; and oil gravity drainage from the fully oil-saturated block in the oil zone and the blocks between that and the present GOC.<br/><br/>The flow behavior developed from the history match is that the oil-drainage performance follows that of stacks of discontinuous blocks, supporting practically no vertical capillary continuity between the matrix blocks (see '''Fig. 12.8''').<br/><br/>By going to immiscible gas injection, oil recovery is increased by about 500 × 10<sup>6</sup> bbl by returning to the original reservoir pressure and could be increased by another 100 × 10<sup>6</sup> bbl if the reservoir pressure is increased an additional 100 psi because of the reduction in gas/oil IFT with increasing reservoir pressure.<br/><br/>Overall, the application of immiscible gas injection to the Haft Kel field has been considered a success. The estimated displacement efficiency by water was 17%, whereas that estimated for immiscible gas displacement was 32%.<br/><br/>'''''Swanson River Field (Cook Inlet, Alaska)'''''<ref name="r24">Young, R.E., Fairfield, W.H., and Dykstra, H. 1977. Performance of a High-Pressure-Gas Injection Project, Swanson River Field, Alaska. J Pet Technol 29 (2): 99-104. SPE-5874-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/5874-PA.</ref> A very different style of successful immiscible gas/oil displacement project is that applied to the Swanson River field’s Hemlock reservoir. '''Figs. 12.21 and 12.22''' show an areal view of this reservoir and a type log through the Hemlock formation, respectively. This field is a north/south-trending anticlinal flexure about 6 miles long by 1 to 3 miles wide with as much as 600 ft of closure. The Hemlock formation consists of interbedded fine- to coarse-grained sandstone, conglomerate, siltstone, and coal, with numerous thin, impermeable, calcareous stringers of somewhat limited areal extent. Field experience has confirmed that these calcareous stringers are effective barriers to the vertical migration of fluids in the vicinity of producing wells. There are 10 Hemlock intervals, and the H1 through H5, H8, and H10 intervals have been engineered and managed separately (see '''Fig. 12.22''').<br/><br/><gallery widths="300px" heights="200px">
</ref> The field is currently being blown down to recover as much gas as possible. On the basis of production data through 2002, on a stock-tank-oil basis, approximately 74% of the OOIP has been recovered from this field by application of the immiscible gas/oil gravity drainage process.<br/><br/>'''''Heft Kel Field (Iran)'''''<ref name="r30">Saidi, A.M. 1996. Twenty Years of Gas Injection History into Well-Fractured Haft Kel Field (Iran). Presented at the International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition of Mexico, Villahermosa, Mexico, 5–7 March. SPE 35309. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/35309-MS.</ref> An example of the application of immiscible gas/oil displacement in a large Middle East matrix-block/fracture-system reservoir is the Heft Kel field. Its Asmari reservoir structure is a strongly folded anticline that is 20 miles long by 1.5 to 3 miles wide with an oil column thickness of approximately 2,000 ft. The most probable OOIP was slightly > 7 × 10<sup>9</sup> STB with about 200 million STB in the fissures; numerical model history matching resulted in a value of 6.9 × 10<sup>9</sup> STB. The matrix block size determined from cores and flowmeter surveys varied from 8 to 14 ft. The numerical simulation model considered matrix permeabilities from 0.05 to 0.8 md. The overall horizontal and vertical permeabilities are approximately equal. There was an initial gas cap on the oil column. The oil gravity is approximately 37°API. The IFT at the bubblepoint pressure (1,412 psi and 116°F) is approximately 9 dynes/cm.<br/><br/>The field was discovered and put on production in 1928. It was produced on primary production from then until 1976 with a plateau rate of 200,000 BOPD for several early years. In 1976, gas injection began at a rate of 400 MMcf/D using gas from the nearby NIS gas dome. Recently, the field has been producing at approximately 35,000 BOPD.<br/><br/>Saidi<ref name="r30">Saidi, A.M. 1996. Twenty Years of Gas Injection History into Well-Fractured Haft Kel Field (Iran). Presented at the International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition of Mexico, Villahermosa, Mexico, 5–7 March. SPE 35309. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/35309-MS.</ref> describes the many oil recovery mechanisms at work in this oil-wet reservoir as gravity drainage at constant IFT and reservoir pressure; oil swelling in the present gas-invaded zone because of the increase in reservoir pressure; oil swelling in the present oil zone through thermal convection/diffusion process; oil imbibition within the oil column; oil gravity drainage from the partially saturated blocks within the gas-invaded zone; and oil gravity drainage from the fully oil-saturated block in the oil zone and the blocks between that and the present GOC.<br/><br/>The flow behavior developed from the history match is that the oil-drainage performance follows that of stacks of discontinuous blocks, supporting practically no vertical capillary continuity between the matrix blocks (see '''Fig. 12.8''').<br/><br/>By going to immiscible gas injection, oil recovery is increased by about 500 × 10<sup>6</sup> bbl by returning to the original reservoir pressure and could be increased by another 100 × 10<sup>6</sup> bbl if the reservoir pressure is increased an additional 100 psi because of the reduction in gas/oil IFT with increasing reservoir pressure.<br/><br/>Overall, the application of immiscible gas injection to the Haft Kel field has been considered a success. The estimated displacement efficiency by water was 17%, whereas that estimated for immiscible gas displacement was 32%.<br/><br/>'''''Swanson River Field (Cook Inlet, Alaska)'''''<ref name="r24">Young, R.E., Fairfield, W.H., and Dykstra, H. 1977. Performance of a High-Pressure-Gas Injection Project, Swanson River Field, Alaska. J Pet Technol 29 (2): 99-104. SPE-5874-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/5874-PA.</ref> A very different style of successful immiscible gas/oil displacement project is that applied to the Swanson River field’s Hemlock reservoir. '''Figs. 12.21 and 12.22''' show an areal view of this reservoir and a type log through the Hemlock formation, respectively. This field is a north/south-trending anticlinal flexure about 6 miles long by 1 to 3 miles wide with as much as 600 ft of closure. The Hemlock formation consists of interbedded fine- to coarse-grained sandstone, conglomerate, siltstone, and coal, with numerous thin, impermeable, calcareous stringers of somewhat limited areal extent. Field experience has confirmed that these calcareous stringers are effective barriers to the vertical migration of fluids in the vicinity of producing wells. There are 10 Hemlock intervals, and the H1 through H5, H8, and H10 intervals have been engineered and managed separately (see '''Fig. 12.22''').<br/><br/><gallery widths="300px" heights="200px">
File:vol5 Page 1140 Image 0001.png|'''Fig. 12.21 – Swanson River field. Contour map of top of Hemlock structure.<ref name="r24" />'''
File:vol5 Page 1140 Image 0001.png|'''Fig. 12.21 – Swanson River field. Contour map of top of Hemlock structure.<ref name="r24" />'''


Line 585: Line 584:


<nowiki>*</nowiki>
<nowiki>*</nowiki>
Conversion factor is exact.</div></div>[[Category:PEH]] [[Category:5.4.2 Gas injection methods]]
Conversion factor is exact.</div></div>[[Category:PEH]] [[Category:Volume V – Reservoir Engineering and Petrophysics]]  [[Category:5.4.2 Gas injection methods]]
Automoderated users, Bureaucrats, checkuser, contributors, createpage, diff, display-new-unapproved-content, displaysubtitle, edit, editsandbox, history, industry, Interface administrators, member, memberonlyaccess, minoredit, Moderators, override, reupload, reupload-own, Staff, Administrators, upload, Upload Wizard campaign editors, viewlinktolatest, watch, widgeteditor, wysiwyg
7,247

edits