You must log in to edit PetroWiki. Help with editing
Content of PetroWiki is intended for personal use only and to supplement, not replace, engineering judgment. SPE disclaims any and all liability for your use of such content. More information
Design for decommissioning: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Draft Index for review by the Joint Industry project.& | <p>Draft Index for review by the Joint Industry project.  The final page will be completed soon with many additions | ||
</p><p>1 Statement of objectives | |||
</p><p>The D4D Database provides feedback from late life and abandonment operations.  It provides practical guidance to engineers when designing new facilities or modifying existing facilities | |||
</p><p>The challenges and issues encountered at the end of a facility's life may not be foreseen or correctly considered during the design phase. This lack of attention can make the eventual decommissioning work more technically challenging and costly.  The purpose of the database is to identify decommissioning issues based on real industry lessons learnt and translate these into potential solutions which could be implemented in future designs | |||
</p><p>2 History of JIP | |||
</p><p>Work group: formed in Aug 2016 with thirteen organisations | |||
</p><p>Initial project scope: boundaries identified – i.e. subsea only | |||
</p><p>Demonstrated economic value: examined the influence of decommissioning costs in the whole asset lifecycle | |||
</p><p>Structure for database: defined for use by Lead Design Engineers | |||
</p><p>Database populated: input from decommissioning community as follows | |||
• One on one interviews lasting about one hour with all members of the JIP gaining their experience in the UKCS, Africa, Norwegian and Australian waters. | |||
• Attendance at the decommissioning conferences | |||
o Decom North Sea, | |||
o Oil and Gas UK, | |||
o Norwegian Petroleum Forum, | |||
o SE Asia Kuala Lumpur, | |||
o SPE workshop Kuala Lumpur | |||
o Decom World Houston | |||
o Decom World Aberdeen | |||
• Review of the Lessons learnt of BP when doing decommissioning projects in the North Sea over the last five years | |||
• Reading the technical press (Offshore Engineer and SPE journal during the last two years) | |||
</p><p>Industry guidelines: started preparation to integrate findings and recommendations into the conceptual and FEED phases of the lifecycle | |||
</p><p>3 Decommissioning cost matrix | |||
</p><p> | |||
</p><p> | |||
</p><p>4 When to incorporate decommissioning in design | |||
</p><p>Decommissioning shuold be incorporated in the design during the Define or FEED stage of the project.  This is the stage of a project where the major design criteria are written in to the Basis of design and design specifications.  After this stage the project  team has moved to the Execute stage  and Change control is rigoursly enforced.  Modifications to the design to assist or ease decommissioning will not meet the criteria for the change control committee.  | |||
</p><p>Before the Define or FEED stage the project team will be studying several options to select the best solution to develop the field.  There is not enough definition of the options to consider design for the final decommissioning.  The decommissioning specialist should provide an estimated cost of decommissioning and remvoing each option for the project cost estimates and list the removal options and any issues for the regulators and other stakeholders. | |||
</p><p>5 Database of lessons learnt and design guidance | |||
</p> | |||
<table class="wikitable"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<th> Engineer Down | |||
</th> | |||
<th> Unmitigated cost | |||
</th> | |||
<th> Issue | |||
</th> | |||
<th> Mitigation | |||
</th></tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td> Example | |||
</td> | |||
<td> High | |||
</td> | |||
<td> Difficulty with flushing | |||
</td> | |||
<td> Identify Disposal route for fluids | |||
</td></tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td> Example | |||
</td> | |||
<td> High | |||
</td> | |||
<td> Gas freeing of pipeline for decommissioning | |||
</td> | |||
<td> Write procedure during design | |||
</td></tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td> Example | |||
</td> | |||
<td> High | |||
</td> | |||
<td> Flushing one leg of a pipeline network | |||
</td> | |||
<td> Ensure design has capability to flush one leg whilst remaining stay in operation | |||
</td></tr></table> | |||
<p>6 Economic Benefits | |||
</p><p>7 Contacts  Stuart.Martin@ardent.com, Caroline.Laurenson@xodus.com, Alan.Stokes@advisian.com | |||
</p> | |||
6 Economic Benefits | |||
7 Contacts& |
Revision as of 06:15, 28 September 2017
Draft Index for review by the Joint Industry project. The final page will be completed soon with many additions
1 Statement of objectives
The D4D Database provides feedback from late life and abandonment operations. It provides practical guidance to engineers when designing new facilities or modifying existing facilities
The challenges and issues encountered at the end of a facility's life may not be foreseen or correctly considered during the design phase. This lack of attention can make the eventual decommissioning work more technically challenging and costly. The purpose of the database is to identify decommissioning issues based on real industry lessons learnt and translate these into potential solutions which could be implemented in future designs
2 History of JIP
Work group: formed in Aug 2016 with thirteen organisations
Initial project scope: boundaries identified – i.e. subsea only
Demonstrated economic value: examined the influence of decommissioning costs in the whole asset lifecycle
Structure for database: defined for use by Lead Design Engineers
Database populated: input from decommissioning community as follows
• One on one interviews lasting about one hour with all members of the JIP gaining their experience in the UKCS, Africa, Norwegian and Australian waters. • Attendance at the decommissioning conferences o Decom North Sea, o Oil and Gas UK, o Norwegian Petroleum Forum, o SE Asia Kuala Lumpur, o SPE workshop Kuala Lumpur o Decom World Houston o Decom World Aberdeen • Review of the Lessons learnt of BP when doing decommissioning projects in the North Sea over the last five years • Reading the technical press (Offshore Engineer and SPE journal during the last two years)
Industry guidelines: started preparation to integrate findings and recommendations into the conceptual and FEED phases of the lifecycle
3 Decommissioning cost matrix
4 When to incorporate decommissioning in design
Decommissioning shuold be incorporated in the design during the Define or FEED stage of the project. This is the stage of a project where the major design criteria are written in to the Basis of design and design specifications. After this stage the project team has moved to the Execute stage and Change control is rigoursly enforced. Modifications to the design to assist or ease decommissioning will not meet the criteria for the change control committee.
Before the Define or FEED stage the project team will be studying several options to select the best solution to develop the field. There is not enough definition of the options to consider design for the final decommissioning. The decommissioning specialist should provide an estimated cost of decommissioning and remvoing each option for the project cost estimates and list the removal options and any issues for the regulators and other stakeholders.
5 Database of lessons learnt and design guidance
Engineer Down | Unmitigated cost | Issue | Mitigation |
---|---|---|---|
Example | High | Difficulty with flushing | Identify Disposal route for fluids |
Example | High | Gas freeing of pipeline for decommissioning | Write procedure during design |
Example | High | Flushing one leg of a pipeline network | Ensure design has capability to flush one leg whilst remaining stay in operation |
6 Economic Benefits
7 Contacts Stuart.Martin@ardent.com, Caroline.Laurenson@xodus.com, Alan.Stokes@advisian.com