You must log in to edit PetroWiki. Help with editing

Content of PetroWiki is intended for personal use only and to supplement, not replace, engineering judgment. SPE disclaims any and all liability for your use of such content. More information


Automated drilling: Difference between revisions

PetroWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
Great flaws remain in the capabilities and availability of rig crews on a global scale, keeping automated drilling a necessity for the near future. A small group of early adopters and innovators are responsible for determining the success of automated drilling. Their success could affect major changes in how drilling systems are designed and operated by probing that data and algorithms can make drilling safer, more consistent and more economical by reducing nonproductive time (NPT).   
Great flaws remain in the capabilities and availability of rig crews on a global scale, keeping automated drilling a necessity for the near future. A small group of early adopters and innovators are responsible for determining the success of automated drilling. Their success could affect major changes in how drilling systems are designed and operated by probing that data and algorithms can make drilling safer, more consistent and more economical by reducing nonproductive time (NPT).   


=== Future ===
<h3> Future </h3>
<p>Experts are divided on their view of the future for automated systems: Some see a generation of mostly autonomous rigs while others say that, in the near future, rigs will most likely be controlled remotely by drillers, geologists, and engineers working in office buildings&#160;ome experts foresee a gene rather than in the field, and on several wells at once. Systems are currently evolving to turn&#160;drillers and rigs into something akin to commercial airliners, whereby many functions of the airplane are automated, giving pilots the ability to take control if they need to.
</p><p>In the latter scenario,&#160;new fleets of rigs do not need to be created, but existing fleets will be retrofitted with highly advanced computer programs that use real-time data combined with mechanized equipment to increase the ROP and maintain wellbore stability. Two of the most recent examples of commercial technologies were developed by members of SPE’s Drilling Systems Automation Technical Section (DSATS).


Experts are divided on their view of the future for automated systems: Some see a generation of mostly autonomous rigs while others say that, in the near future, rigs will most likely be controlled remotely by drillers, geologists, and engineers working in office buildings&nbsp;ome experts foresee a gene rather than in the field, and on several wells at once. Systems are currently evolving to turn&nbsp;drillers and rigs into something akin to commercial airliners, whereby many functions of the airplane are automated, giving pilots the ability to take control if they need to.
In 2014, ConocoPhillips and National Oilwell Varco (NOV) completed a pilot program in Texas to test a new automated system, which reduced drilling time by more than 40%. The technology has since expanded to North Dakota, will soon be used in the North Sea, and could be introduced in the Middle East by the end of 2015.


In the latter scenario,&nbsp;new fleets of rigs do not need to be created, but existing fleets will be retrofitted with highly advanced computer programs that use real-time data combined with mechanized equipment to increase the ROP and maintain wellbore stability. Two of the most recent examples of commercial technologies were developed by members of SPE’s Drilling Systems Automation Technical Section (DSATS).
A ConocoPhillips rig operating at dusk in the Eagle Ford Shale of Texas, where the operator completed six wells using an automated drilling package developed by National Oilwell Varco. By the final well, the system reduced drilling time by 43% compared with wells drilled without it. <em>Image courtesy of ConocoPhillips.</em>
A ConocoPhillips rig operating at dusk in the Eagle Ford Shale of Texas,...
For Tony Pink, vice president of NOV’s dynamic drilling solutions and services business, the automated system is an answer to US shale producers and other companies that desperately need to lower their break-even cost of production to cope with low oil prices. “This technology could make some [projects] that are struggling today become economic again,” he said. “If the cost per barrel is USD 55, we are effectively knocking USD 8 off that cost per barrel.”
 
Also last year, Norwegian software firm Sekal installed an automated program called DrillTronics on an offshore drilling platform operated by Statoil in the North Sea to speed up tripping and connection times. The program has been under development for decades and works by controlling torque, pump pressure, and hook load.
 
</p>


== References &nbsp;&nbsp; ==
== References &nbsp;&nbsp; ==

Revision as of 03:58, 10 June 2015

Computer-controlled drilling is slowly changing how the oil and gas industry discovers natural resources. Automated drilling can reduce the number of injuries to zero and increase productivity and accuracy.

History

Comparison to human drilling

Disadvantages

Global oil prices and a surplus of gas have caused an improvement in the economics of automated projects. Meanwhile, in North America, human-operated drilling has greatly improved.

Companies like Shell have chosen to scale back and even cancel many projects in which automated drilling would play a crucial role in developing thousands of wells. This is after the company made years of headway in automated technology. According to a 2011 issue of Drilling Contractor, the first generation of Shell's automated control system already showed a 70% improvement in rate of penetration (ROP) in test areas. But human drillers have recently narrowed the gap, leaving that number irrelevant.

Advantages

Great flaws remain in the capabilities and availability of rig crews on a global scale, keeping automated drilling a necessity for the near future. A small group of early adopters and innovators are responsible for determining the success of automated drilling. Their success could affect major changes in how drilling systems are designed and operated by probing that data and algorithms can make drilling safer, more consistent and more economical by reducing nonproductive time (NPT).   

Future

Experts are divided on their view of the future for automated systems: Some see a generation of mostly autonomous rigs while others say that, in the near future, rigs will most likely be controlled remotely by drillers, geologists, and engineers working in office buildings ome experts foresee a gene rather than in the field, and on several wells at once. Systems are currently evolving to turn drillers and rigs into something akin to commercial airliners, whereby many functions of the airplane are automated, giving pilots the ability to take control if they need to.

In the latter scenario, new fleets of rigs do not need to be created, but existing fleets will be retrofitted with highly advanced computer programs that use real-time data combined with mechanized equipment to increase the ROP and maintain wellbore stability. Two of the most recent examples of commercial technologies were developed by members of SPE’s Drilling Systems Automation Technical Section (DSATS).

In 2014, ConocoPhillips and National Oilwell Varco (NOV) completed a pilot program in Texas to test a new automated system, which reduced drilling time by more than 40%. The technology has since expanded to North Dakota, will soon be used in the North Sea, and could be introduced in the Middle East by the end of 2015.

A ConocoPhillips rig operating at dusk in the Eagle Ford Shale of Texas, where the operator completed six wells using an automated drilling package developed by National Oilwell Varco. By the final well, the system reduced drilling time by 43% compared with wells drilled without it. Image courtesy of ConocoPhillips. A ConocoPhillips rig operating at dusk in the Eagle Ford Shale of Texas,... For Tony Pink, vice president of NOV’s dynamic drilling solutions and services business, the automated system is an answer to US shale producers and other companies that desperately need to lower their break-even cost of production to cope with low oil prices. “This technology could make some [projects] that are struggling today become economic again,” he said. “If the cost per barrel is USD 55, we are effectively knocking USD 8 off that cost per barrel.”

Also last year, Norwegian software firm Sekal installed an automated program called DrillTronics on an offshore drilling platform operated by Statoil in the North Sea to speed up tripping and connection times. The program has been under development for decades and works by controlling torque, pump pressure, and hook load.

References   

Noteworthy papers in OnePetro

External links

See also