You must log in to edit PetroWiki. Help with editing

Content of PetroWiki is intended for personal use only and to supplement, not replace, engineering judgment. SPE disclaims any and all liability for your use of such content. More information


Asphaltene deposition and plugging

PetroWiki
Revision as of 09:51, 2 June 2015 by Denise Watts (Denisewatts) (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

After precipitation, asphaltene can remain as a suspended solid in the oil or deposit onto the rock. Here, the term precipitation corresponds to the formation of a solid phase from thermodynamic equilibrium and deposition means the settling of solid particles onto the rock surface. Deposition will induce alteration of wettability (from water-wet to oil-wet) of the rock and plugging of the formation. These aspects have been known for a long time and are the subject of many recent investigations. This section reviews the investigations and laboratory observations of these aspects.

Experiments

Measurements of the deposition and plugging effects were performed by Piro et al.[1] in sand packs and by Turta et al.,[2] Minssieux,[3] and Ali and Islam[4] in cores to study asphaltene deposition and the subsequent effect of permeability reduction. Yeh et al.,[5] Kamath et al.,[6] and Yan et al.[7] performed core displacements to investigate the effect of wettability alteration caused by deposition and its subsequent effect on the recovery.

Deposition and plugging

Asphaltene deposition in porous media exhibits similarities with the deposition of fines. The main phenomena are:

  • Adsorption
  • Surface deposition
  • Plugging deposition

Piro et al.[1] used asphaltene precipitates collected from a field in northern Italy or induced by diluting two crude oils with n-heptane. The diluted mixture of crude oil with a given concentration of precipitate was injected into sand packs, and the concentration of asphaltene precipitate at the outlet was measured. The deposited amounts were calculated by difference.

Minssieux[3] performed comprehensive core experiments for three crude oils from different parts of the world (France, North Africa, and North America) and four types of cores:

  • Three sandstone cores with different permeabilities and clay contents
  • Core from the Algerian Hassi Messaoud field, which suffers strong asphaltene-precipitation problems

Asphaltene precipitates were obtained by diluting crude oils with n-heptane. Pressure drops across the core were measured to determine the permeability reduction caused by asphaltene deposition. The amounts of deposited asphaltene along the core were estimated with a pyrolysis technique.

Ali and Islam[4] performed core tests with crude oils from the United Arab Emirates. Crude oil with 3 wt% of asphaltene precipitate (induced by n-heptane) was injected into carbonate cores at four different rates. The pressure drops across the core were measured to determine the permeability reduction.

Turta et al.[2] performed high-pressure core-displacement experiments with propane. Crude oils from west-central and northwestern Alberta were used. Asphaltene precipitation occurred within the core when propane mixed with the oil in the displacement process. Permeability reduction was inferred by measuring pressure drops across the core.

Adsorption

The first step in the deposition is the adsorption of asphaltene onto the rock surface. The adsorption of asphaltene onto different rocks has been measured extensively in static experiments that showed that the asphaltene adsorption onto different rocks can be modeled with Langmuir isotherms.[8][9][10] Fig. 1 from Dubey and Waxman[9] shows typical Langmuir isotherms for asphaltene adsorption on different rocks. The Langmuir isotherm equation is

RTENOTITLE....................(1)

where:

  • Csf = concentration of suspended solid in the oil phase
  • wsa = mass of adsorbed asphaltene per mass of rock
  • (wsa)max = maximum adsorbed mass fraction (the plateau in Fig. 1)
  • Ka = ratio of rate constants of the adsorption/desorption reactions

Adsorption is higher for rock containing a higher content of shales. Because adsorption is a surface phenomenon, its main effect is the alteration of the rock wettability from water-wet to oil-wet.

General deposition process

In addition to adsorption, Minssieux[3] showed that deposition occurs because of mechanical entrapment similar to the deposition of fines in porous media. Pressure drops across the core were measured for several experiments to assess the deposition and plugging effects caused by asphaltene. Minssieux reported that the most noticeable plugging occurred in sandstones containing clays and in tight sandstones. Fig. 2 shows the reduction of oil permeability as a function of pore volume injected for sandstones with and without clay. Fig. 3 shows the permeability reduction for tight sandstone. Minssieux also used the pore-blocking model of Wojtanowicz et al.[11] to analyze the experimental results.

Ali and Islam[4] combined a model for adsorption with the model of Gruesbeck and Collins[12] for the entrainment and deposition of fines in porous media to analyze their experimental results. Gruesbeck and Collins assumed that the porous medium could be divided into two parallel pathways: small pore sizes, in which plug-type deposits occur and can eventually be plugged completely, and larger pore sizes, in which surface nonplugging deposits occur. Particles could be mobilized from the surface deposits if the fluid velocity exceeds a critical value. Fig. 4 illustrates this concept.

For nonpluggable pathways,

RTENOTITLE....................(2)

whereas for pluggable pathways,

RTENOTITLE....................(3)

where:

  • Ca = concentration of precipitated asphaltene in weight percent
  • uc = critical speed required to mobilize surface deposit asphaltene
  • unp = fluid velocity in nonpluggable pathways
  • σnp = volume fraction of deposited asphaltene in nonpluggable pathway
  • σp = volume fraction of deposited asphaltene in pluggable pathway
  • α, β, χ, and γ = model parameters

Gruesbeck and Collins gave empirical correlations for calculating up and unp from u, as well as the permeabilities of pluggable and nonpluggable pathways as functions of the volumes of deposited asphaltene. Eq. 2 implies that the deposited asphaltene in nonpluggable pathways is mobilized if the velocity, unp, is greater than the critical velocity, uc. Ali and Islam[4] developed a 1D, single-phase flow simulator with the Gruesbeck and Collins deposition model. They identified three regimes for asphaltene deposition and plugging depending on the flow rate:

  • Monotonous steady state
  • Quasisteady state
  • Continuous plugging

Fig. 5 shows the experimental results and the match obtained with the model described in Eqs. 2 and 3. At low flow rates (monotonous steady-state regime), the permeability reduction took place in a monotonous fashion. At intermediate flow rates (quasisteady-state regime), initial reduction in permeability was observed until a minimum was reached. After reaching this minimal value, the trend was reversed with an increase in permeability. Ali and Islam attributed this increase to the mobilization of asphaltene deposited in nonpluggable pathways. At higher flow rates (continuous-plugging regime), the permeability reduction began late in the injection process but was very rapid once begun.

Wang and Civan[13][14] modified the Gruesbeck and Collins model to obtain

RTENOTITLE....................(4)

where:

  • Ea = volume of deposited asphaltene per bulk volume of rock
  • vc = critical interstitial velocity for surface deposition
  • vo = interstitial oil velocity ( = uo/Φ)
  • α, β, γ, η are model parameters

The separation of pathways into pluggable and nonpluggable has been eliminated. The last term in Eq. 4 represents the plugging deposit and is set to zero if the average pore throat diameter is greater than a critical pore throat diameter (i.e., there is no plugging deposit if the pore throat is large).

The porosity occupied by the fluid is

RTENOTITLE....................(5)

where Φ0 is the initial porosity. The reduction in permeability is calculated from

RTENOTITLE....................(6)

where:

  • k0 is the initial permeability
  • fp is the porous medium particle transport efficiency factor.[13]

Wang and Civan[13] developed a 1D, three-phase, four-pseudocomponent simulator that incorporates the previous deposition and plugging model. They showed that their model could match some of the core deposition experiments by Minssieux[3] and Ali and Islam.[4]

Kocabas and Islam[15] extended the model of Ali and Islam to the analysis of deposition and plugging in the near-wellbore region. Leontaritis[16] also developed a single-phase radial model to analyze the near-well pressure behavior when asphaltene deposition and plugging occur. Ring et al.[17] described a three-component, thermal reservoir simulator for the deposition of waxes in which only surface deposition is considered. Nghiem et al.[18][19] have incorporated in a 3D compositional simulator both a thermodynamic single-component solid model for asphaltene precipitation and a deposition model based on adsorption and plugging deposit. A resistance factor approach was used to model permeability reduction caused by asphaltene deposition. Qin et al.[20] proposed a method for compositional simulation based on similar approaches.

Wettability alteration

The alteration of formation wettability caused by asphaltene deposition has been the subject of numerous investigations. Asphaltene adsorption onto the rock surface is the main factor for wettability alteration from water-wet to oil-wet. Collins and Melrose,[8] Kamath et al.,[6] Clementz,[21] Crocker and Marchin,[22] and Buckley et al.[23][24] described the change of formation wettability from water-wet to mixed-wet or oil-wet on adsorption of asphaltene onto the rock surface:

  • Clementz[21] discussed the permanent alteration of core properties after asphaltene adsorption.
  • Collins and Melrose[8] showed that asphaltene adsorption is reduced but not eliminated by the presence of water films on water-wet rock.
  • Crocker and Marchin[22] and Buckley et al.[23][24] studied asphaltene adsorption for different oil compositions and the corresponding degree of wettability alteration.
  • Yan et al.[7] performed injection of asphaltenes (obtained for diluting crude oils from Wyoming and Prudhoe Bay with n-hexane) into Berea core.

After the displacements, imbibition tests were performed to determine changes in core wettability. They showed that the amount of adsorbed asphaltene is dependent on the ions present in the brines (in this case Na+, Ca2+, and Al3+) and that adsorption increases with an increase in ion valency. The highest adsorption occurred with Al3+ in the brine. Significant changes in wettability of the sandstone core were observed after asphaltene adsorption.

Morrow[25] reviewed the effect of wettability on oil recovery. Wettability has been shown to affect:

  • Relative permeabilities
  • Irreducible water saturation
  • Residual oil saturation
  • Capillary pressures
  • Dispersion
  • Electrical properties

The alteration of relative permeabilities and endpoints has the strongest influence on displacement processes.

  • Morrow[25] reviewed results for core waterfloods showing that the shift toward a less water-wet condition can range from being highly adverse to highly beneficial to oil recovery.
  • Huang and Holm,[26] Lin and Huang,[27] and Yeh et al.[5] presented results on the implication of wettability changes on water-alternating-gas (WAG) processes.

Typical results for CO2 WAG processes[26] indicate that the amount of oil trapped in water-wet cores (45%) was much higher than that trapped in either mixed-wet (15 to 20%) or oil-wet cores (5%).

Yeh et al.[5] performed experiments in a capillary-tube visual cell showing the change in wettability on asphaltene precipitation by mixing a west Texas oil with CO2 and a Canadian Mitsue crude oil with hydrocarbon gas at reservoir conditions. They also carried out WAG coreflood experiments under reservoir conditions in which asphaltene precipitation occurred. The residual oil saturation after each flood was measured and compared with the value obtained in displacements with refined oils in which there were essentially no changes in wettability. For some experiments, they observed substantial reduction in residual oil saturations when wettability was altered. A wettability change from water-wet to oil-wet conditions increases the contact between oil and solvent and is responsible for a decrease in residual oil saturation.

Kamath et al.[6] performed injection of a precipitating solvent (n-pentane or n-heptane) in cores saturated with crude oil. The plugging caused by asphaltene was assessed by measuring pressure drops across the cores. After the injection of solvent, water was injected and recovery and relative permeabilities were measured to study the effect of deposition on displacement efficiency. Three cores were used:

  • Core 1 is a Berea sandstone core with permeability of 236 md and porosity of 27.9%
  • Cores 2 and 3 are unconsolidated sandpack cores with permeability of 2380 and 1520 md and porosity of 32.7 and 31.3%, respectively

Fig. 6 shows the reduction in permeability with respect to the degree of asphaltene deposition. As expected, permeability reduction was highest for the least permeable core (Core 1) and smallest for the most permeable core (Core 2). Fig. 7 shows cumulative fractional recovery for Core 1 vs. pore volume of water injected for various degrees of asphaltene deposition. The results show an improved displacement efficiency with an increase in the deposited amounts. Similar results were obtained for Cores 2 and 3. Kamath et al.[6] concluded from their experiments that although deposition causes permeability reduction, it may improve the sweep efficiency through the alteration of relative permeability curves and flow-diverting effects. Shedid[28] performed similar displacement experiments on low-permeability carbonate cores instead of sandstone cores and observed substantial permeability damage with deposition.

The wettability alteration caused by asphaltene deposition is a complex process that is still a subject of many investigations. The degree of wettability change may not be uniform, as discussed in Al-Maamari and Buckley.[29] The subsequent effect of wettability on relative permeabilities and oil recovery is also a complex subject. There are still unexplored areas, and the whole process is not completely understood at this time. Although the change from water-wet to oil-wet conditions caused by asphaltene precipitation may favor sweep efficiency of waterflood or WAG processes inside the reservoir, the plugging effect near the wellbore remains detrimental to oil production. Inside the reservoir, fluids can find their way around regions of deposition, but, around the wellbore, plugging will prevent flow of oil from converging to the wellbore. Remedial actions then are required to increase production.

Nomenclature

Ca = concentration of precipitated asphaltene in wt %, m/m
Csf = concentration of suspended solid in the oil phase [ppm (μg/g)]
Ea = volume of deposited asphaltene per bulk volume of rock, L3/L3
fp = porous medium particle transport efficiency factor
k = permeability, L2
k0 = initial permeability, L2
Ka = ratio of rate constants of the adsorption/desorption reactions
t = time, t
uc = critical speed required to mobilize surface deposit asphaltene, L/t
unp = fluid velocity in nonpluggable pathways, L/t
uo = oil velocity, L/t
vc = critical interstitial velocity for surface deposition, L/t
vo = interstitial oil velocity ( = uo / Φ), L/t
wsa = mass of adsorbed asphaltene per mass of rock, m/m
(wsa)max = maximum adsorbed mass fraction (the plateau in Fig. 1), m/m
α = asphaltene-deposition model parameters (Eqs. 2 and 4)
β = asphaltene-deposition model parameters (Eqs. 2 and 4)
γ = asphaltene-deposition model parameters (Eqs. 3 and 4)
η = asphaltene deposition model parameters (Eq. 4)
σnp = volume fraction of deposited asphaltene in nonpluggable pathway
σp = volume fraction of deposited asphaltene in pluggable pathway
Φ = porosity
Φ0 = initial porosity
χ = asphaltene deposition model parameters (Eq. 3)

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Piro, G., Canonico, L.B., Galbariggi, G. et al. 1996. Asphaltene Adsorption Onto Formation Rock: An Approach to Asphaltene Formation Damage Prevention. SPE Prod & Oper 11 (3): 156-160. SPE-30109-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/30109-PA
  2. 2.0 2.1 Turta, A.T., Najman, J., Singhal, A.K. et al. 1997. Permeability Impairment due to Asphaltenes During Gas Miscible Flooding and its Mitigation. Presented at the International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, 18-21 February. SPE-37287-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/37287-MS
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Minssieux, L. 1997. Core Damage From Crude Asphaltene Deposition. Presented at the International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, 18-21 February. SPE-37250-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/37250-MS
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Ali, M.A. and Islam, M.R. 1998. The Effect of Asphaltene Precipitation on Carbonate-Rock Permeability: An Experimental and Numerical Approach. SPE Prod & Oper 13 (3): 178-183. SPE-50963-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/50963-PA
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Yeh, S.W., Ehrlich, R., and Emanuel, A.S. 1992. Miscible-Gasflood-Induced Wettability Alteration: Experimental Observations and Oil Recovery Implications. SPE Form Eval 7 (2): 167-172. SPE-20186-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20186-PA
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 Kamath, V.A., Yang, J., and Sharma, G.D. 1993. Effect of Asphaltene Deposition on Dynamic Displacements of Oil by Water. Presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anchorage, Alaska, 26-28 May. SPE-26046-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/26046-MS
  7. 7.0 7.1 Yan, J., Plancher, H., and Morrow, N.R. 1997. Wettability Changes Induced by Adsorption of Asphaltenes. SPE Prod & Oper 12 (4): 259-266. SPE-37232-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/37232-PA
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Collins, S.H. and Melrose, J.C. 1983. Adsorption of Asphaltenes and Water on Reservoir Rock Minerals. Presented at the SPE Oilfield and Geothermal Chemistry Symposium, Denver, 1-3 June. SPE-11800-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/11800-MS
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Dubey, S.T. and Waxman, M.H. 1991. Asphaltene Adsorption and Desorption From Mineral Surfaces. SPE Res Eng 6 (3): 389-395. SPE-18462-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18462-PA
  10. Gonzalez, G. and MariaTravalloni-Louvisse, A. 1993. Adsorption of Asphaltenes and Its Effect on Oil Production. SPE Prod & Oper 8 (2): 91-96. SPE-21039-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/21039-PA
  11. 11.0 11.1 Wojtanowicz, S.K., Krilov, Z., and Langlinais, J.P. 1987. Study of the Effect of Pore Blocking Mechanisms on Formation Damage. Presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 8–10 March. SPE-16233-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/16233-MS
  12. Gruesbeck, C. and Collins, R.E. 1982. Entrainment and Deposition of Fine Particles in Porous Media. SPE J. 22 (6): 847-856. SPE-8430-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/8430-PA
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Wang, S. and Civan, F. 2001. Productivity Decline of Vertical and Horizontal Wells by Asphaltene Deposition in Petroleum Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, 13-16 February. SPE-64991-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/64991-MS
  14. Chang, F.F. and Civan, F. 1997. Practical model for chemically induced formation damage. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 17 (1–2): 123-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(96)00061-7
  15. Kocabas, I. and Islam, M.R. 1998. A Wellbore Model for Predicting Aspholtene Plugging. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 27-30 September. SPE-49199-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/49199-MS
  16. Leontaritis, K.J. 1998. Asphaltene Near-wellbore Formation Damage Modeling. Presented at the SPE Formation Damage Control Conference, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 18-19 February. SPE-39446-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/39446-MS
  17. Ring, J.N., Wattenbarger, R.A., Keating, J.F. et al. 1994. Simulation of Paraffin Deposition in Reservoirs. SPE Prod & Oper 9 (1): 36-42. SPE-24069-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/24069-PA
  18. Nghiem, L.X., Coombe, D.A., and Farouq Ali, S.M. 1998. Compositional Simulation of Asphaltene Deposition and Plugging. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 27-30 September. SPE-48996-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/48996-MS
  19. Nghiem, L.X., Kohse, B.F., Ali, S.M.F. et al. 2000. Asphaltene Precipitation: Phase Behaviour Modelling and Compositional Simulation. Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Conference on Integrated Modelling for Asset Management, Yokohama, Japan, 25-26 April. SPE-59432-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/59432-MS
  20. Qin, X., Wang, P., Sepehrnoori, K. et al. 2000. Modeling Asphaltene Precipitation in Reservoir Simulation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39 (8): 2644-2654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie990781g
  21. 21.0 21.1 Clementz, D.M. 1982. Alteration of Rock Properties by Adsorption of Petroleum Heavy Ends: Implications for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 4-7 April. SPE-10683-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/10683-MS
  22. 22.0 22.1 Crocker, M.E. and Marchin, L.M. 1988. Wettability and Adsorption Characteristics of Crude-Oil Asphaltene and Polar Fractions. J Pet Technol 40 (4): 470-474. SPE-14885-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/14885-PA
  23. 23.0 23.1 Buckley, J.S., Liu, Y., Xie, X. et al. 1997. Asphaltenes and Crude Oil Wetting - The Effect of Oil Composition. SPE J. 2 (2): 107-119. SPE-35366-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/35366-PA
  24. 24.0 24.1 Buckley, J.S., Liu, Y., and Monsterleet, S. 1998. Mechanisms of Wetting Alteration by Crude Oils. SPE J. 3 (1): 54-61. SPE-37230-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/37230-PA
  25. 25.0 25.1 Morrow, N.R. 1990. Wettability and Its Effect on Oil Recovery. J Pet Technol 42 (12): 1476-1484. SPE-21621-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/21621-PA
  26. 26.0 26.1 Huang, E.T.S. and Holm, L.W. 1988. Effect of WAG Injection and Rock Wettability on Oil Recovery During CO2 Flooding. SPE Res Eng 3 (1): 119-129. SPE-15491-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/15491-PA
  27. Lin, E.C. and Huang, E.T.S. 1990. The Effect of Rock Wettability on Water Blocking During Miscible Displacement. SPE Res Eng 5 (2): 205-212. SPE-17375-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/17375-PA
  28. Shedid, S.A. 2001. Influences of Asphaltene Deposition on Rock/Fluid Properties of Low Permeability Carbonate Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain, 17-20 March. SPE-68229-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/68229-MS
  29. Al-Maamari, R.S.H. and Buckley, J.S. 2000. Asphaltene Precipitation and Alteration of Wetting: Can Wettability Change during Oil Production? Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 3-5 April. SPE-59292-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/59292-MS

Noteworthy papers in OnePetro

Use this section to list papers in OnePetro that a reader who wants to learn more should definitely read

External links

Use this section to provide links to relevant material on websites other than PetroWiki and OnePetro

See also

Asphaltenes and waxes

Asphaltene problems in production

Thermodynamic models for asphaltene precipitation

Remedial treatment for asphaltene precipitation

Formation damage from paraffins and asphaltenes

PEH:Asphaltenes_and_Waxes